TrueStake

TrueStake

Ethereum Upgrade Timeline

Every network upgrade from genesis to the roadmap, and what each one changed for stakers — grounded to EIP and ethereum.org sources.

The Proof-of-Work Era
Jul 2015
FrontierThe Proof-of-Work Era
Ethereum genesis
what it changed for stakers
The chain goes live under proof-of-work. There is no staking yet — new ETH issuance goes to miners.

Ethereum launched as a proof-of-work chain: miners, not validators, secured it and collected the block reward (5 ETH per block at the start). There were no validators and no staking — the idea of staking ETH would not reach mainnet for another five years.

For a staking-economics record, Frontier is simply year zero: it marks where Ethereum begins, and everything this timeline actually tracks starts later, once the Beacon Chain goes live.

The Merge & Proof-of-Stake
Dec 2020
epoch 0
Beacon Chain genesisThe Merge & Proof-of-Stake
Staking begins
what it changed for stakers
Staking starts. The deposit contract goes live — 32 ETH per validator, ~21,000 genesis validators — running in parallel to proof-of-work.

The Beacon Chain started as a separate proof-of-stake chain running in parallel to the still-live proof-of-work mainnet. It carried no user transactions — its only job was to prove that proof-of-stake consensus could run at scale before it took over.

The deposit contract had gone live weeks earlier (November 2020), and reaching genesis took a wave of early stakers: about 21,000 validators at 32 ETH each signed the first block. This is the moment staking rewards began accruing — even though staked ETH was locked, with no way to withdraw it yet.

Aug 2021
LondonThe Merge & Proof-of-Stake
EIP-1559 fee market
what it changed for stakers
Base fees start being burned and priority "tips" are introduced — the execution-layer tips that PoS proposers would later earn.

London introduced EIP-1559, splitting every transaction fee into a base fee that is burned (removed from supply for good) and an optional priority fee, or tip. Under proof-of-work the tip went to miners — but the design quietly pre-built the fee economics that proof-of-stake proposers would inherit at the Merge.

For stakers, London is the reason a validator's execution-layer income is priority tips plus MEV, and never the burned base fee. That burn is also why heavy network usage can make ETH net-deflationary.

EIP-1559 · fee market
Sep 2022
epoch 146875
The Merge (Paris)The Merge & Proof-of-Stake · The Merge
Proof-of-Work → Proof-of-Stake
what it changed for stakers
Proof-of-work retired. Validators begin earning execution-layer rewards (priority fees + MEV); the static block subsidy drops to zero. (Bellatrix, the consensus-layer prep fork, activated Sept 6 at epoch 144896.)

The Merge swapped Ethereum's consensus engine from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake in a single block, with no downtime: the execution layer simply began taking its consensus from the Beacon Chain. Issuance fell by roughly 88% overnight because the static block subsidy dropped to zero.

From here, validators earn on two layers at once — consensus-layer rewards (attestations, sync committees, block proposals) plus execution-layer priority fees and MEV. Bellatrix, the consensus-layer preparation fork, had activated nine days earlier at epoch 144896; it is frequently mislabeled as the Merge itself, which is why this timeline pins the real transition to epoch 146875.

Apr 2023
epoch 194048
Shapella · CapellaThe Merge & Proof-of-Stake
Withdrawals enabled
what it changed for stakers
Staked ETH can finally leave the beacon chain. 0x01 credentials unlock the auto-sweep — balance over 32 ETH pays out to your execution address every ~9–12 days.

Shapella combined Shanghai on the execution layer with Capella on the consensus layer, and finally let staked ETH leave the Beacon Chain — for about two and a half years, staking had been deposit-only.

It unlocked two flows: a full exit that returns a validator's whole balance once it exits, and an automatic skim that sweeps any balance above 32 ETH to the validator's 0x01 execution address every 9 to 12 days. Withdrawals turned staking from a one-way lockup into a liquid, cash-flowing position — and made a wallet-level record of staking receipts possible for the first time.

EIP-4895 · push withdrawals
Scaling & Staking Maturity
Mar 2024
epoch 269568
DencunScaling & Staking Maturity · The Surge
Blob transactions
what it changed for stakers
Cheaper layer-2 data via blobs (EIP-4844). Proposers still earn only base + priority fees — blob fees are burned, not paid to validators.

Dencun (Deneb on the consensus layer, Cancun on the execution layer) introduced blobs via EIP-4844, often called proto-danksharding: a cheap, temporary data lane that cut layer-2 transaction costs by roughly an order of magnitude.

The staking detail that matters is what did not change. Blob fees are burned, not paid to proposers, so a validator's reward is untouched by blob activity. Dencun is the clearest case of an upgrade reshaping Ethereum's economics for users while leaving the validator reward formula alone.

EIP-4844 · blobs
May 2025
epoch 364032
Pectra · ElectraScaling & Staking Maturity
Bigger validators, EL-triggered exits
what it changed for stakers
Max effective balance rises to 2,048 ETH for 0x02 "compounding" validators (rewards auto-compound). Execution-layer-triggered exits and partial withdrawals arrive.

Pectra (Prague on the execution layer, Electra on the consensus layer) was the largest staking-focused upgrade since withdrawals. EIP-7251 raised the maximum effective balance from 32 to 2,048 ETH, letting an operator consolidate many 32-ETH validators into a single 0x02 compounding validator whose rewards auto-compound instead of being swept out.

EIP-7002 added execution-layer-triggered exits and partial withdrawals, so a validator's withdrawal address — not only its signing key — can now start an exit. Together they changed both the shape of validator balances and who holds the power to exit.

EIP-7251 · MaxEBEIP-7002 · EL exits
Dec 2025
epoch 411392
FusakaScaling & Staking Maturity · The Surge
PeerDAS
what it changed for stakers
Mostly layer-2 scaling (PeerDAS). Validators gain bandwidth tiering; reward accounting is unchanged. Blob-parameter sub-forks BPO1 (Dec 2025) and BPO2 (Jan 2026) followed.

Fusaka (Fulu on the consensus layer, Osaka on the execution layer) delivered PeerDAS (EIP-7594), the next step in data-availability sampling: validators verify blob data by sampling a fraction of it rather than downloading all of it, raising blob throughput without raising the hardware bar.

Reward accounting is unchanged — the shift is operational (bandwidth and peering), not economic. Fusaka also introduced Blob-Parameter-Only sub-forks, BPO1 (December 2025) and BPO2 (January 2026), which raise blob targets on a set schedule without a full network upgrade.

EIP-7594 · PeerDAS
The Road Ahead
◆ NOW · Jul 2026
Targeting H2 2026
GlamsterdamThe Road Ahead · The Scourge
Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation
what it will change for stakers
Block-building moves into the protocol (EIP-7732, ePBS). MEV-Boost relays become optional and an in-protocol builder pays the proposer directly — changing how MEV income is attributed. Block-Level Access Lists (EIP-7928) land too.
Targeting H2 2026
projected activation window
estimated — no activation epoch scheduled yet

Glamsterdam's headline is enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation (EIP-7732, ePBS): the block-building role that MEV-Boost relays perform off-protocol today moves into the protocol itself. An in-protocol builder commits to a payload and pays the proposer directly, and a new Payload-Timeliness Committee duty checks that the payload was published on time.

The consequence for stakers is that MEV-Boost relays become structurally optional, and MEV income is attributed on-chain rather than through a relay's own accounting — a meaningful change to how proposer income is measured and proven. Block-Level Access Lists (EIP-7928) also land, declaring up front which state a block will touch. Both EIPs are fork headliners but still formally in Draft status, and no mainnet activation slot is set.

EIP-7732 · ePBSEIP-7928 · BALs
HegotáThe Road Ahead · The Scourge
FOCIL & account abstraction
possible staking impact
FOCIL (EIP-7805) could add an inclusion-list duty — a new validator responsibility and reward/penalty surface. Native account abstraction is under consideration, not confirmed.

Hegotá's confirmed headliner is FOCIL (EIP-7805, Fork-Choice-enforced Inclusion Lists): a committee of validators would each name transactions the next block must include, hardening censorship resistance — and adding a new validator duty with its own reward and penalty surface.

Native account abstraction, which would make smart-contract accounts first-class, is under consideration for this upgrade but not confirmed. As a further-out upgrade, treat Hegotá's scope as directional rather than settled.

EIP-7805 · FOCIL
The Horizon
Beyond the next upgrades, Ethereum's roadmap points in several directions — active research with no scheduled date. The community names below (The Verge, The Purge, The Splurge) are a narrative device, not ethereum.org's current structure.
Single-slot finality
Active research · no date — expected only after statelessness
Finalize a block within the same slot it is proposed, collapsing today's roughly 15-minute (two-epoch) finality delay toward seconds.
possible staking impact
Could move every validator to attesting every slot instead of in rotating committees, and may mean rethinking the 32 ETH minimum — a structural change to the active validator set and how attestation rewards accrue.
StatelessnessThe Verge
Deprioritized · the cryptographic approach is still unsettled
Let a validator verify blocks from a small cryptographic witness instead of storing Ethereum's full state — the long-running goal known as The Verge.
possible staking impact
Would drop the hardware bar for home staking dramatically — attesting could run on near phone-class devices — widening who can run a validator without a service.
History & state expiryThe Purge
Partly shipped · pre-Merge history expiry is already live
Stop requiring nodes to keep old blocks and state they no longer need to validate the chain, moving long-term archival to dedicated services. The umbrella name is The Purge.
possible staking impact
Lighter, cheaper-to-run nodes — the partial history expiry already live saves hundreds of gigabytes — which lowers the cost of running your own validator.
EIP-4444 · history expiry
Post-quantum securityThe Splurge
Long-horizon research · targeted around 2029 as a planning milestone, not a commitment
Prepare Ethereum's cryptography for a future in which quantum computers could break today's signatures. The Ethereum Foundation stood up a dedicated post-quantum team in early 2026.
possible staking impact
The plan is to eventually replace validators' BLS signatures with a quantum-resistant, hash-based scheme — a signing-scheme change for every validator, but years away.
SOURCES ·pq.ethereum.org
Ethereum Upgrade Timeline — history & roadmap for stakers · TrueStake